I just wanted to share a quick thought before retiring for the night\u2026<\/p>\n
Don\u2019t miss updates on Procurement & Supply Chain, Subscribe here!<\/p>\n
When procurement managers are charged with implementing improvements, they often look to benchmarking initiatives as a place to get some ideas on what needs to be done.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s excellent. But it requires a degree of caution.<\/p>\n
When benchmarking, procurement managers often look at what the \u201cbest in class\u201d are doing. And they aspire to do the same things.<\/p>\n
The trouble arises when the \u201cas is\u201d and the \u201cto be\u201d models are drastically different and the procurement manager tries to do everything at once. You see, the best in class, be it Wal-Mart or General Electric or United Technologies or anyone else, didn\u2019t get that way overnight. Their procurement processes are the result of years and years of small, incremental improvements.<\/p>\n
Trying to become like GE in one fell swoop is almost a ticket for failure. You would literally have to demolish everything procurement-related and build from the ground up!<\/p>\n
This approach would risk major disruptions in operations and be a change management nightmare.<\/p>\n
So, proper benchmarking should culminate in a well-prioritized plan that has a near guarantee of success, not an instant upheaval that will likely not be fixed before the procurement manager is looking at our Web site\u2019s purchasing jobs page!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I just wanted to share a quick thought before retiring […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":4046,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-procurement"],"yoast_head":"\n