{"id":2531,"date":"2008-10-08T14:02:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-08T14:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.certitrek.com\/nlpa\/2008\/10\/08\/whitepaper-wednesday-profit-growth-through-procurement\/"},"modified":"2021-07-16T04:10:37","modified_gmt":"2021-07-16T08:10:37","slug":"profit-growth-through-procurement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.certitrek.com\/nlpa\/blog\/profit-growth-through-procurement\/","title":{"rendered":"Profit Growth Through Procurement"},"content":{"rendered":"
We found great takeaways from an SAP white paper called \u201cEnabling Profitable Growth Through Procurement: Transforming The Sourcing & Procurement Organization.\u201d<\/p>\n
It started with the typical high-level, fundamental stuff about procurement contributing to competitive advantage. It then focused on how much harder it is to get Sales to contribute the same degree of profit impact as Procurement.<\/p>\n
This was what the publication advocated:<\/p>\n
Here’s an interesting excerpt:<\/p>\n
\u201cAfter acquiring the right people, top-performing organizations train and nurture their employees, offering educational and certificate programs to enhance their skills\u2026almost 62% of sourcing and procurement employees [in leading organizations] had formal training in negotiations, compared to 45% for other companies.\u201d<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Here’s my takeaway from this: Sixty-two percent seems a bit low. That means that over 1\/3 of the people negotiating procurement contracts aren\u2019t even trained!<\/p>\n
\n
- Some interesting research results were cited, including:<\/li>\n
- how the average company has centralized about 69% of its sourcing and procurement functions (hopefully that doesn\u2019t mean PO cutting) and;<\/li>\n
- how the study found that companies implementing a category-aligned organizational approach were more efficient in terms of full-time equivalents per billion in spend.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n