{"id":3015,"date":"2011-02-14T14:34:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-14T14:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.certitrek.com\/nlpa\/2011\/02\/14\/proof-that-government-is-not-a-role-model-for-ethical-procurement\/"},"modified":"2021-07-14T06:35:35","modified_gmt":"2021-07-14T10:35:35","slug":"proof-that-government-is-not-a-role-model-for-ethical-procurement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.certitrek.com\/nlpa\/blog\/proof-that-government-is-not-a-role-model-for-ethical-procurement\/","title":{"rendered":"Proof That Government Is NOT A Role Model For Ethical Procurement"},"content":{"rendered":"

When I saw the headline in today\u2019s Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that read \u201cPa. senator\u2019s Super Bowl trip courtesy of Consol,\u201d I thought for sure I\u2019d be reading about an elected government official being unseated over a breach of ethics.<\/p>\n

Not so.<\/p>\n

Despite the fact that \u201cSenate President Pro Tem Joe Scarnati, R-Brockway, had his ticket, plane ride, and hotel bill paid for by Consol Energy Inc., a major coal producer and one of the companies drilling for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale,\u201d it appears that the senator is not only being allowed to keep his job but, shockingly, is credited for behaving within the guidelines of ethical conduct set forth by Pennsylvania government! Let me first give a brief introduction to the Marcellus shale drilling controversy and then I\u2019ll talk about why strict ethical guidelines are important in both government and procurement\u2026<\/p>\n

The whole Marcellus Shale drilling issue is one of the most controversial political things happening right now in Pennsylvania as many residents are concerned about drinking water contamination, property value reduction, and other ill-effects of the drilling. So, for an elected official to accept Super Bowl tickets and travel accommodations from a company with an interest firmly on one side of the issue is unfathomable to me.<\/p>\n

However, the article points out that \u201cPennsylvania law allows legislators to accept such tickets and travel so long as they report everything above a $650 annual threshold.\u201d That\u2019s troubling!<\/p>\n

Look, gifts either influence the receiver or create the perception that the receiver is influenced by them. To allow a legislator to have no limit on the gifts s\/he can receive and be influenced by as long as they report what they get \u2013 whoopdeedoo \u2013 is scary.<\/p>\n

What scares me more is how Senator Scarnati\u2019s office, like Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl has in the past, using the \u201cbut the rules say it\u2019s OK\u201d defense in deflecting any ethical scrutiny. Yes, the rules say it\u2019s OK but, c\u2019mon, don\u2019t these politicians have common sense?<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re accepting such extravagant personal gifts, you\u2019re going to be influenced. And any decision you make in favor of who bought you those gifts will appear to have been the result of that influence.<\/p>\n

Accepting gifts \u2013 unless required by a culturally sensitive situation and then only when there is an ethical way of distributing those gifts so that you do not personally benefit from them \u2013 is a dumb move. It is clear that, if the \u201crules\u201d are loose and leave room for the potential gift receiver to exercise judgment, good judgment will not prevail on many occasions.<\/p>\n

Moral of the story: organizations and their procurement departments should have tight, documented standards against accepting gifts. And you\u2019ll have to look to the procurement community for those standards. Obviously, the government is not a role model for ethical procurement.<\/p>\n

One last note: Even if there is no procurement policy that currently forbids you from accepting gifts, decline them anyway. You\u2019ll be a better professional for having standards that are above and beyond those that are written (or not yet written).<\/p>\n

Recommended Reading<\/b><\/p>\n